An analysis of the decision by Borden Ladner GervaisIn an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the availability of equitable rescission to avoid unanticipated adverse tax consequences, even where such consequences were the direct result of the taxpayers’ reliance on long-accepted guidance from the Canada Revenue Agency. The Canadian Supreme Court also effectively barred taxpayers from seeking other equitable relief options for tax-related errors, except in very narrow circumstances.Our Canadian firm, Borden Ladner Gervais, provides a detailed analysis of this landmark decision.
Authors: Laurie Goldbach and Elizabeth EgbertsRead the full article here.
For similar content to our Global Guide, subscribe to our mailing list and keep up to date.
