loader image

An analysis by Taxand Cyprus

 

To counter transactions whose main purpose is to grant inappropriate tax benefits, many countries introduced into their tax codes certain specific anti-avoidance rules or targeted anti-avoidance rules. Because these rules proved to be inadequate, both the OECD and the EU introduced two general anti-abuse rules of their own.

 

Christos Theophilou (Director) in our Cypriot firm, Taxand Cyprus, compares the principal purpose test in the OECD’s 2017 Model Tax Convention with the EU’s general anti-abuse rule.

 

Read the full article here.

Thank you for downloading

For similar content to our Global Guide, subscribe to our mailing list and keep up to date.

* indicates required
Crosshairs Icon

Article tags

EU | OECD | Tax | Tax Law

Newsletter

Keep up to date with news, views and insights from Taxand

Search