loader image

Further Queries

An overview from COBALT, Taxand Latvia

 

The Administrative Regional Court has upheld Bauer Spezialtiefbau GmbH’s entitlement to a VAT refund of EUR 143,844, dismissing the Latvian State Revenue Service’s appeal.

 

The judgment confirms that a VAT refund cannot be refused solely on the assumption that a foreign business carried out taxable activities in Latvia. Instead, the tax authority must demonstrate, with supporting evidence, that the taxpayer itself undertook taxable transactions in Latvia. The decision also clarifies the distinction between a permanent establishment for corporate income tax purposes and a fixed establishment for VAT purposes.

 

Our Latvian member firm, COBALT explores the significance of the judgment and its implications, which you can read here.

Thank you for downloading

For similar content to our Global Guide, subscribe to our mailing list and keep up to date.

* indicates required
Crosshairs Icon

Article tags

Case Law | Corporate Profit Tax | Law | VAT

Newsletter

Keep up to date with news, views and insights from Taxand

Search