loader image

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /app/wp-content/themes/taxand/template-parts/Body-Thinking-Detail.php on line 116

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /app/wp-content/themes/taxand/template-parts/Body-Thinking-Detail.php on line 116

An overview from Borgen Tax, Taxand Netherlands

 

The Court of Justice of the European Union has clarified the scope of anti-abuse rules under the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive, ruling that Member States may deny a dividend withholding tax exemption even where the receiving parent company is economically active and is not simply a conduit. The judgment arose from the NEO GROUP case involving a Lithuanian subsidiary and a Cypriot parent company.

 

The Court confirmed that the EU anti-abuse rule is not limited to conduit companies and that an economically active parent may still be caught where it forms part of a non-genuine arrangement delivering a tax advantage to an ultimate controlling person. It also clarified that authorities could consider the wider shareholder structure rather than focusing solely on the direct parent company.

 

For multinational groups, the ruling highlights the importance of considering the full ownership chain and documenting the commercial rationale underpinning structures and transactions.

 

Tax experts from Borgen Tax, Taxand Netherlands, examine the judgment and what the expanded interpretation of EU withholding tax anti-abuse rules could mean for international businesses, which you can read here.

Thank you for downloading

For similar content to our Global Guide, subscribe to our mailing list and keep up to date.

* indicates required

Newsletter

Keep up to date with news, views and insights from Taxand

Search